Marketing of Evil

David Kupelian’s book, The Marketing of Evil, is a must read. To successfully market evil to the American people it is first necessary to convince them that evil is good. This is done by changing the meaning of words, of language.

For example, in the Marketing of Evil double-speak the word homosexual is changed to “gay.” Gay used to be a perfectly wonderful word that conjured up visions of happiness and contentment. Now it is deliberately twisted around to cover over a sinful lifestyle.

Similarly, the evil of sexually molesting little boys is justified as “man-boy love.” Killing unborn babies becomes freedom of choice and aborted babies are referred to as “fetuses.” This is really an Alice in Wonderland deception. Nothing means what it should mean or really is what it is. The intention is to program us to believe that words mean whatever we are told they are supposed to mean regardless of their historical origins or use.

Kupelian quotes homosexual activists Kirk and Madsen as saying that their plan to force the homosexual lifestyle on the American people “… depends centrally upon a program of unabashed propaganda, firmly grounded in long-established principles of psychology and advertising.” Kupelian points out that marketing homosexuality is, “not about rights. It’s about redefining truth and censoring all criticism so that militant homosexuals can be comfortable in their ‘lifestyle’ without having to be disturbed by reality.”

He also relates the marketing of evil to some very old truths – one of those being that in some instances there is no room for neutrality. “When Jews are being gassed and cremated down the street, ‘neutrality’ is not neutral – it’s collaboration.” The same can be said of sugar coating abortion and homosexuality.

In keeping with this perversion of language, the entire news media of today would have us believe that they are fair and balanced in their reporting. Were they at the Dachau Concentration Camp in Germany at the beginning of WWII viewing Hitler’s efforts to find efficient ways to exterminate millions of Jews, they would want to interview Hitler on camera to get his point of view, before drawing any conclusions.

America’s news media is, “… intent on advancing ideologies and agendas that are hostile to traditional American values.” The news media is in lock-step with the agenda of social activists who are determined to twist, capture and mold public opinion in evil ways and then, after they have eliminated “Fathers” from the family unit, to change the nation’s laws to advance their activist agenda.

Professor Stephen Baskerville of Howard University explains these kinds of evil machinations and points out that once the “Father Figure” is eliminated from the family, “The state functionally replaces him as protector and provider.”  The State markets its concept of the meaning of life directly to the family and establishes what is so-called acceptable and not acceptable conduct and belief.

This double-speak and marketing of evil does not just apply to domestic affairs and policy. It is also used to pretend that foreign affairs policies are benign when in fact they may be evil and may culminate in an evil result. As an example, President Obama wants to rejuvenate the Palestinian-Israeli peace process. No doubt that would appear to be a noble effort. But what he doesn’t understand and what Presidents Carter, Clinton and the Bushes didn’t understand before him is that contrary to what the world and our leaders have been told, “The Arab-Palestinian leadership doesn’t want peace with Israel; it wants Israel.”

It takes no effort to be part of today’s mislead, negligent and inattentive culture. It takes real diligence, effort and reflection not to be a part of it. Our ancestors founded this nation upon the belief that, “There is a God, that He is the God of the Bible, that the Ten Commandments and the Sermon on the Mount are the foundation of a good life and a great society, and that America has been uniquely blessed by that God.”

David Kupelian encourages us to violently cast aside society’s marketing of evil double-speak and to embrace our traditional national and historical values and heritage. I agree with him.

 

 

What did you think of this article?




Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this post.
Comments
  • No comments exist for this post.
Leave a comment

Comments are closed.